In December , one of the most eminent economists of the time, Alvin E. Hansen, delivered the Presidential Address, titled “Economic. Summers’ theory of “secular stagnation” (a term first used by the economist Alvin Hansen back in ) holds that, in the United States, the. Recently, Hansen’s secular stagnation hypothesis has gained renewed stagnation in the US in much the same way as suggested by Alvin Hansen in
|Published (Last):||1 November 2004|
|PDF File Size:||17.15 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.12 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Yet few there are who believe that in a period of investment stagnation an abundance of loanable funds at low rates of interest is alone adequate to produce a vigorous flow of real investment. University of Wisconsin—Madison Yankton College. Schultze Charles P.
Arrow Walter W. Heck, why not get the Government to fund proper, desirable skills training for the unemployed? Nourse Albert B.
Secular suggests a very long term — perhaps 20 years. Patten Davis R. Investment often drops during recessions, and sometimes between recessions, but the investment drop during the Great Recession was especially severe, and the bounceback even to usual levels is not yet complete.
For example, why should unpleasant jobs like cleaning toilets offer only minimum wage?
MacroMania: Alvin Hansen’s Secular Stagnation Hypothesis
Sure these ideas aren’t exclusively Keynesian but given he wrote the paper three years after the GT and that he even reviewed the GT OctJournal Of Political Economy soon after it appeared seems odd. Paragraph 1 I need no explanation – it’s after all my opinion that only fools could form unbiased opinions, since all but the foolish can and are swayed by arguments from the same political and economic leaning of them.
This, I suggest, is more likely the cause of Japanese secular stagnation than spastic monetary policy. Dewey Edmund J. Having become uncompetitive, the world looked to others, increasingly China, as a source of investment and cheap goods.
Koopmans Robert M. Should we estimate a Hamilton regime-switching model on growth rate regimes and correlate estimated growth regime against the average employment-to-population ratio? James Henry W. Hansen served on several government advisory posts, e. The rate of economic growth is determined by technological progress and population growth.
Hansen’s book, Fiscal Policy and Business Cyclesalvn the first major work in the United States to entirely support Keynes’s analysis of the causes of the Great Depression. I’m not entirely sure why this was the case, especially in light of the subsequent popularity of Keynesian theory. From Hansen’s secular stagnation point of view, the key problem of the U.
Franco Modigliani Lawrence R. The theory Hansen espouses seems to relate the level of employment say, as measured by the employment-to-population ratio or the unemployment rate to the rate of economic growth.
Alvin Hansen – Wikipedia
Krueger Arnold C. Ripley Harry A. And even if progress was at times interrupted by recession, these episodes were short-lived with rapid recovery. Even the Japanese diverted domestic investment to China. At first suspicious of Keynes ‘s General Theory when it first came out, Hansen soon converted c. hansrn
He could see the stagnation of investment and the inability of capitalism to bring the required level of investment forth. His first book at Harvard posed the question Full Recovery or Stagnation?
Taylor Edwin F. However, its internal cost structure eventually caught up with its success, leading to its demise.
Economic Growth, that the s experienced a great deal of technological growth. Klein Jacob Marschak Tjalling C. Seager Carl C. Hansen frequently testified before Congress. It is used in mainstream economics literature and textbooks to illustrate how monetary and fiscal policy can influence GDP.
For example, Hansen discusses a slowdown in population growth, which was certainly a fair reading of the trends at that time, but completely missed that US fertility rates were about to take off less than a decade later at the start of what we call the “baby boom. I’m not saying it can’t be done. Shortly after he wrote, the growth factors took off alvni the unemployment rate remained low on average. He received in Ph.
Anonymous March 9, at